should gamers be accountable for ingame war crimes

F'm and feed'm fish heads. If nothing else, adding behind-the-scenes political proceedings would increase the realism and imersiveness of war games, making them more fun (to me, anyway). We are at war with another corp. One of their members challenges me to a 1 on 1 and assures me the rest of their guys will abide by it. Ohh man. Keith Stuart: The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, punishing player characters for war crimes. In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. Shishimarin pleaded guilty to shooting Oleksandr Shelipov, 62, in . October 7, 2013 in Off-Topic Discussion. BBC has no right to stick their nose in bloody business that's theirs. Next thing you know, the Red Cross will want to require psych evals for people that have thoughts contrary to their rules. Dont kill last guy take him to me. They can go ahead and give an opinion but at the end of the day, people like me couldn't GAF. This is something military games have been telling us for many years. These games were rarely straightforward escapist action yarns, they brought grit and tactical depth, and they did so by utilising Clancy's idea of a world overrun by warring techno factions.. Asking for a friend. Last I checked, I'm out and about hunting bad guys whether they're the Covenant from the 'Halo' series or terrorists bad guys in 'Modern Warfare'. What the Red Cross wants to see then is the player being penalised for carrying out such actions as willfully killing civilians or torturing enemy combatants, both of which are punishable under international law. Complete address if you would like to receive our posted newsletter. 18 Sep 2022 00:17:51 . Barrett explained that the ICRC were already working with production companies to incorporate these rules into games and others who they had not contacted, had also incorporated some of them into their products. No, being a gamer should make you exempt from punishments for war crimes committed IRL. This brings in subject matter I am not comfortable to discuss on a forum. If they actually played the game they'd see that the point of the game is beating the bullies. Honestly, if they added this to it and worked it into the game properly, I might actually have more interest in playing an FPS. The sequence was brave, but also clumsily handled, exploitative and incongruous; however, it did place the player in a position where many felt they genuinely had to weigh up their moral proclivities with the demands of the gameplay mission. It may not display this or other websites correctly. And vitally, those who point their gun in the air before firing get the same dispersal effect without casualties. I sure do love the smell of executed and wounded Germans in the cold streets of Stalingrad. The only way I could see games getting more realistic in this type of respect would be to add a sort of PoW feature instead of just busting in a room and killing all the bag guys without any option for them to surrender. Should actors be accountable for a murder in their movie? 1. Press J to jump to the feed. Having more of these games with varied missions, rules/laws you have to abide by, etc. These days, if you accidentally (or otherwise) shoot a civilian or comrade in a military shooter, youll probably get a mission failed message and a one-way trip back to the last checkpoint. There's also a robotic empire where you can set it so it can't negotiate with organic species and only robotic ones, 'determined exterminator' it only wants to destroy organics. Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes? Our Discord Server can be found in the sidebar below. I suggest folks read the article before going "OMG PC" or "OMG IDIOTS." For more information, please see our "It's difficult to make out the difference between real footage and the footage you get from video games.". Yes gamers should be held responsible. I don't even think that's what the ICRC wants it doesn't want moral doubt to arise purely through aesthetics, it wants designers to think about international law, and about how warfare should operate. It wants developers to say, in this mission you must fly an armed drone over a school where terrorists are known to be hiding, and you must decide whether to open fire. Same. A series of international statutes, conventions and norms have developed and identify a range of violations related to armed conflict. How the left is pushing us toward civil war, and how this has worked in the past. - Mongoose - 10-06-2013 Seems interesting to be aware of, although not applicable (or is it?) It would take a LOOOT of work to make it actually an engaging aspect of FPS games, though. We use Mailchimp to store this information and send emails. ZOMBIES AREN'T PEOPLE ANYMORE! Shooting civilians, torture, attacking ambulances and killing prisoners are all aspects in video games that they want to address, he explained. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. (Read 1746 times) Success means blending in with the terror squad, and it's up to the player to decide whether that extends as far as shooting civilians. I was just following orders. People playground players. If governments aren't being held accountable for war crimes anymore, why should people playing video games? You can war dec any PC corp for any reason, keep the war going for as long as you want, suicide gank every one of their toons when they leave for NPC corps and it still aint griefing. 6. When I read the thread title, I was thinking this was a play of words on match gamers. Ad Bot. I don't think anyone would appreciate someone saying that about us based on a headline. We do often see the consequences of player actions being threaded into gameplay, but this tends to be in the adventure genre. Just that their warcrimes have consequences. High Rock - Geographically cutoff from the rest of the empire. PhantOS. You will not believe how many times I tell to random dudes. LeCard's example of enemies looking to surrender, having to subdue them, handcuff them, handle that aspect of the mission instead of just "er mah gerd shert shert shert them all, keep sherting til they're all deeeerd!". The International Committee of the Red Cross have called for video games to punish crimes committed in battle by adhering to real-life international war conventions. But then if the consequences of illegal operations are subsumed into the gameplay mechanics i.e. Press J to jump to the feed. if you mean people hurting other people's feelings I say its too dam bad its a game suck it up . Article (with reader comments) from The Guardian. In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the Red Cross told a reporter that, due to the increasing verisimilitude between first-person shooters and real-life combat, games should start to abide by the international laws of armed conflict. What you wont get is a military tribunal and a dishonorable discharge. Tx38b. In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the Red Cross told a reporter that, due to the increasing verisimilitude between first-person shooters and real-life combat, games should start to abide by the international laws of armed conflict. Anti-war activists battle to get their voices heard in WW1 centenary events War crimes in video games should be punished, ICRC says , The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws. Ark players. ODogX 6 may 2020 692 27 *remembers what happened in Dubai* BUKLAU_CHANG 6 may 2020 618 46 Should politicians be held accountable for the wars they start? I shot my team mate in the ass in Arma III and ran over all the civilians in the first grand theft auto. Warrior Nation: Anti-establishment ethos: critiquing the military and foreign policy, Warrior Nation: Very murky: the arms trade and Parliament, Warrior Nation podcast Gentleman Bureaucrat Masculinity: liberal militarism and the civil service, Warrior Nation podcast Lifting the Rock: the military and justice, Warrior Nation podcast Dirty Secrets: the press and the military, Warrior Nation podcast: Unpacking Armed Forces Day. Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes - funny, gamers, accountable, in-game, crimes. But it could realistically be put in actual military simulators, such as ARMA for example. Boy they would hate what I did with my evil characters in skyrim and fallout 4. I mean why put your self out online if you have such a weak self image if what someone you may never meet or know could influence your feelings or make you day or even a minute of your day bad , why ? It's not actually advocating that gamers themselves suffer some kind of actual punishment for committing in-game warcrimes. One question though, is "Teabagging" a war crime? 840 21. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Pages: 1 [2] Author Topic: Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? and our (Read 1802 times) Epicduke. No Votes: 18 94.7% Other Votes: . Killing civilians gets points deducted or what-have-you, while shooting the baddies progresses the game or gets you points. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? After reading what counts as one online, and not counting repeat offences, becase for most it is more than once, and in many cases more than I would be able remember, here is a list of ingame warcrimes I have commited because I am bored; Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention: Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments; Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health; Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly. What about the few people that 100% the entire CoD series? The Arma series currently on its third iteration is detailed enough to be used for training purposes by many of the world's standing armies. There is a big line between reality and the virtual world and for example, I cannot remember a video game shooter where I'm gunning civilians. All Rights Reserved, By submitting your email, you agree to our. By which I mean, Ive never committed a genocide. Arma II sold 10x the copies for the zombie mod than the actual 'real life simulation' game play, hint. I don't think anyone would appreciate someone saying that about us based on a headline. Often the most affecting moments are those hidden in momentary or supplementary features. Home article Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? The amount of people I've killed in horrible, horrible ways in the Prototype series alone will have me locked away for a very long time. You must log in or register to reply here. Yes he is, whats going on? As for war crime laws themselves they aren't working terribly well, if the Bush years taught us anything, but that probably a rant for another day. Macsiurtain_2019 6 may 2020 605 30 Re-start mission?". But that's why the whole suggestion being made is the games follow the international war laws, Geneva Convention, things like that. 2022 Monday Good Morning Good Night. We battle and slug it out and despite losing . i play universe sandbox 2 and dbfz so. Much more intriguing, though, is the scene in Yager Development's criminally overlooked shooter, Spec Ops: The Line, where three soldiers are stranded in a wrecked Dubai facing a crowd of angry locals. I read an article like this in a PC Gamer or Game Informer some months ago, but they seemed to be really focused on real-to-life war games, like Call of Duty and the like. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. Signup Login. Titles like Fable, Heavy Rain, Walking Dead and Dishonored all provide different paths for a player depending on their moral decisions during play and because the action is combined with a confirming narrative element, the meaning and weight of transgression can come through. In games, moral depth is much more about humanisation than it is about punishment. 10+ should gamers be accountable for ingame war crimes most standard ; 10+ can you have 2 internet providers in one house most standard ; 10+ which statement best expresses how prospero treats caliban most standard ; 10+ divorce attorney lake st louis most standard I don't see where Red Cross is calling for gamers to be punished. With this thinking Ill get a call from my insurance company when I crash a G6 in Grand theft auto. The original Pokmon TCG base set is coming back as a trio of premium decks, The M1-powered iPad Air gets its biggest discount of $100 off once again, Resident Evil Village is a great PSVR 2 shooter, if you can stomach it. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. This topic makes me laugh. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes Meanwhile Gta players meme from Gamer Memes Download - MemeZila.com 2022 Friday Good Morning Good Night Back to Home Gamer Memes this was a few nights ago, took forever to upload after the capture. Of course, this was really more about mechanics than ethics: players were being tested on their reactions and visual awareness, and failure meant a reduction in game time rather than a few moments' reflection on innocent victims. I would be right now biggest war crimer in world history. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. They should go check out EVE Online! . Of course, this was really more about mechanics than ethics: players were being tested on their reactions and visual awareness, and failure meant a reduction in game time rather than a few moments reflection on innocent victims. Video games, while violent and often depicting death, do not result in the real world equivalent of dead people. Quote: The Red Cross wants to have a greater influence in the virtual world of battlefields. ), Torture, holding hostages, suicide (assist), terrorism, illegal experiments, assaulting minors (technically not in mc but through it), and more i just cant remember how many life sentences is this worth? Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. Seems like a reasonable suggestion to improve the quality of videogames, if you ask me, but I like fiction that deals with consequences of war with ambiguity and complexity. When they start filing sex abuse charges for watching porn hub.some of you guys are real trouble. I don't see where Red Cross is calling for gamers to be punished. Odd as it sounds, but I'd actually enjoy seeing this sort of thing in those military simulators. The way that mobile phone hacking lets us see into the personal problems of potential targets in Watch Dogs. Unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement; Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflict, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts: Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities; Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives; Intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict; Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated; Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended and which are not military objectives; Destroying or seizing the enemy's property unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war; Pillaging a town or place, even when taken by assault; Employing asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and all analogous liquids, materials or devices; Employing weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare which are of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or which are inherently indiscriminate in violation of the international law of armed conflict, provided that such weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare are the subject of a comprehensive prohibition and are included in an annex to this Statute, by an amendment in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth in articles 121 and 123; Intentionally directing attacks against buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international law; Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions; Conscripting or enlisting children under the age of fifteen years into the national armed forces or using them to participate actively in hostilities. The, Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? #should #gamers #accountable #game #war. The failure of modern warfare is that it places way to much value on the lives of civilians. Our intention is not to spoil players enjoyment by for example, interrupting the game with pop-up messages listing legal provisions or lecturing gamers on the law of armed conflict. Just by the name alone people said it was a bully simulator. It is difficult to imagine a Call of Duty or Battlefield title in which shooting a civilian leads to a mission where the player is detained in a military prison for several months before being tried and sentenced. Crime and Punishment . It's a game, nothing "real, or realistic" about it. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Enjoy the meme 'Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes?' uploaded by Bolt93. Our intention is not to spoil player's enjoyment by for example, interrupting the game with pop-up messages listing legal provisions or lecturing gamers on the law of armed conflict. As if the loss of 7 billion people due to genocide was just a footnote. Anyone who plays Saints Row or GTA would REALLY be in trouble. - player abilities. Without an -actual- crime, I don't see how anyone could be held accountable for war crimes in this manner. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. Cookie Notice Not to mention that a vast majority of first person shooters are played by teenagers and young adults - to think that anyone would seriously consider incarcerating hundreds of thousands of children because they play video games blows my mind. warp scramble them for 8 hours sometime, that's grief. I just wanted the Sudetenland. So first off, this article is from October of 2013. wowall the other shit to improve upon in our society and the snowflakes choose this topic. In Battlefield 5 or Call of Duty 27, it may not be so simple to dismiss the sight of a photo-realistic person lying in the dust, eyes rolling back, limbs spasming. NPR's A Martinez talks to White House deputy national security adviser Jon Finer about options available to the U.S. and its allies for holding Russia responsible for alleged war crimes. Instead, the Committee hopes the consequences it requests will halt the potential "trivialization" of war crimes. Something that I think more of the youth playing CoD need. There have been two stand-out examples. Post your templates or request one instead! I mean saved in the last 6 years, Every Minecraft player would go to jail for villager trafficking, I may have committed Genozide in multiple villages and also took war prisoners, creepy is Im not even the worst, Ummm . The best of TommyKay clips and funny moments in one place. Besides, 'realism' in cases such as this would likely amount to pushing particularly political agendas. What do you call a character that runs? It'd make hell of a lot of sense to add to the realism. I remember my first go on Taito's explosive arcade title Operation Wolf it was the late-80s and this frenzied blast-'em-up, with its jungle environment and hostage rescue missions, was clearly gunning for a generation of Rambo II fanatics. Seems to me that without naming names there are a fair number of politicians in my country and others that we can comfortably say are guilty of willful war crimes and crimes against humanity, but instead y'all wanna go on a witch hunt because someone plays Terran in Starcraft 2? . Russia denies it engages in illegal attacks but proof of any use of illegal weaponry such as cluster bombs and any targeting of civilians or civilian buildings like schools and hospitals is already being collated. You are using an out of date browser. Intentionally targeting civilians or civilian buildings is also considered a war crime under international humanitarian law. The ICRC says sanitizing video games is not realistic. If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. How dare any news organisation report something that people don't want to hear. I don't think Prototype would count under "realistic war game", (PS, that's a cool raccoon drawing. Mongoose, If you kill an enemy combatant in real life, then t-bag the shit outta his/her face, is that a crime? / Sign up for Verge Deals to get deals on products we've tested sent to your inbox daily. Seems interesting to be aware of, although not applicable (or is it?) Privacy Policy. Though now that i stop to think about it, is modern war anything other than it twitched shoot it? Tsk, tsk. April 13, 2022 at 5:01 a.m. A Q&A document posted on the organization's website. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Originalton - TommyKay. Its just making it more realistic, the same way the military has rules on the battlefield, then gamers have the same rules., While concern over the influence of violence in video games is shared by many, researchers have not established a definitive link. I don't think it's a bad idea from my completely subjective moral standpoint. Just a 'Hey, you know what would be nice? So I take out a Tristan vs his Thorax and we begin. What you won't get is a military tribunal and a dishonorable discharge. shoot civilian, fail mission the player will usually read these instances in ludic terms. RPC Shutdown Notice - Live until September 2022. And it wants players to understand the consequences of such an action, not just in terms of the score or progress, but in terms of the real world of warfare the one that all military games reflect and fetishise.. The current "shoot everything and don't get shot" extent of those games are /yaaaaaaaaawn. could potentially make them more interesting than just shoot shoot shoot in a hail of bullets. "Video games that represent contemporary battlefields are very close to reality," he said. Please check out our wiki page, where we post template albums of popular media! The ICRC is concerned that certain game scenarios could lead to a trivialization of serious violations of the law of armed conflict, they added. People need thicker skin not just tissue paper for protection . Yes that will make games soooo much more enjoyable by inserting nagging fucking lawyers. I play Stellaris and in that game I literally enslave, genocide, displace entire species and one of the things I can do is eat them/work them to death. It is these sorts of split-second decisions that really suggest something about the complexities of combat. Though I actually play pretty nice. - ranks. A well disciplined enemy! SquidRoss . - robotic integrations on main characters. Now of course it would get boring if everyone gave up, but having the random enemy throw their hands up and surrender would add some realism to the game, and force the player to pay attention to the room instead of the standard, it twitched shoot it rule. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. By All of us: #starwars #battlefront #should #gamers #accountable #game #war. The corporate nature of the F1 world dictates that, in any game depicting it, every sponsor's logo, advertising hoarding and so on has to be authentic, which is why it's physically impossible for. Cookie Notice And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. Both Conservatives and Liberals act like such fucking cunts when it comes to violent video games. Seems like a reasonable suggestion to improve the quality of videogames, if you ask me, but I like fiction that deals with consequences of war with ambiguity and complexity. Keith Stuart: The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, punishing player characters for war crimes. AAA Hard Surface integrator for Characters, Concept artist and Asset artist responsible for: - military enemy characters. In both Heavy Rain and Walking Dead, players face lethal moral decisions that don't end the game, or even have ludic consequences for the player, but yet play on the mind and colour the experience. Really!? The ICRC says it is now working directly with the developers of modern military simulations and the BBC report contains an interview with Marek Spanel of Bohemia Interactive, creator of the Arma series, who claims the studio's games will now be implementing the suggestions. There are many games which offer zero harassment venues, as does Eve in its NPC corp system. Meme Guy photo. When you don't have the sack for the real thing, how else are they going to mind fuck you into believing, they know whats best for all? By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. You want grief? It's not worth the expense. The way we learn little snippets about the lives of the characters passing through our border gates in Papers, Please. And importantly it adds:

Willa Fitzgerald Look Alike, Required Supreme Court Cases Ap Gov Quizlet 2020, John Reed Arhaus Net Worth, Articles S